FSSS Call to Action
Help us convince politicians of the importance in
making our schools seismically safer - take a few
minutes out of your day right now and send a message
to decision makers. We've made it easy for you:
- Create a new email message;
- Copy and paste the following email addresses into your
new email message's To field;
- Give your email an appropriate subject line, such as
"Make School Seismic Safety a Priority";
- Copy and paste the attached suggested letter to decision
makers into your new email message's body; and,
- Add your name and any additional comments you want to
make to the bottom of your new email message and send it
off!
Send your email to these key decision makers and any
others you would like to include:
gordon.campbell.mla@leg.bc.ca,
carole.taylor.mla@leg.bc.ca, shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca,
les.jones.mla@leg.bc.ca, carole.james.mla@leg.bc.ca,
david.cubberley.mla@leg.bc.ca, ken.denike@vsb.bc.ca,
don.lee@vsb.bc.ca, clarence.hansen@vsb.bc.ca,
carol.gibson@vsb.bc.ca, al.wong@telus.net,
sharon.gregson@vsb.bc.ca, allen.blakey@vsb.bc.ca,
shirley.wong@vsb.bc.ca, eleanor.gregory@vsb.bc.ca,
Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca, Fry.H@parl.gc.ca, Owen.S@parl.gc.ca,
Davies.L@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
We also encourage you to separately forward this e-mail to
your friends and contacts and ask them to help us reach out to
public officials as well.
Thanks for your help!
-FSSS
--copy text below here and paste into a new email
message--
Dear Prime Minister Harper, Premier Campbell, Education and
Public Safety ministers, and School District Trustees:
I am writing to express my concern over the failure of
politicians at all levels to adequately address the issue of
school seismic safety in BC.
In October 2004 – a provincial assessment found that 311
schools in BC are “at high risk of sustaining severe damage to
structural elements in the event of a moderate to strong
earthquake.” These buildings are at disproportionately high
risk. We have the most vulnerable members of our society in our
most vulnerable buildings.
In November 2004, Premier Campbell made an impressive $1.5
billion, 15-year commitment to seeing all BC schools meet
acceptable seismic life safety standards by 2019.
In spring 2005, during the election campaign, the government
committed to “fast-tracking” 80 BC schools to see them
completed within 3 years. To date: Structural work has begun,
or has been completed on 4 of the 80 “fast-track” schools.
In the throne speech of 2007, the government indicated its
commitment to urgently upgrading the provincial
legislature.
Over the past 2 decades this province has proactively
upgraded bridges, tunnels, dams, prisons and the liquor branch.
Citizens did not have to ask for this risk mitigation work to
be carried out, nor have they had to ask that the legislature
be upgraded. Mitigating these risks and having carried out the
schools assessment indicates an acknowledgment of the
importance of this work.
World events such as the New Orleans flood make structural
investments like $1 billion to strengthen a levee look
painfully sound in hindsight. Yet it appears that parents and
citizens who have been asking that this problem be addressed in
a timely manner for over a decade will have to continue to
ask.
It does not appear that the mechanisms to achieve the
Premier’s promise have been put in place. It does not appear
that the politicians we elect at any level are demonstrating
commitment or accountability in seeing this issue
addressed.
Why do parents have to keep asking for school seismic
safety? In the aftermath of tragedies elsewhere in the world
parents grieve that the school should have been the safest
building in town – unfortunately schools are frequently the
most highly damaged structures in earthquakes around the world,
sometimes catastrophically. Isn’t this precisely the kind of
work we elect public officials to demonstrate accountability in
carrying out?
By contrast, our neighbours in Seattle will have completed
upgrading and improving their school buildings by 2010 and have
spent $1 billion USD to achieve this. Citizens voted on 3
consecutive ballot initiatives to see their money spent in this
manner.
To school district trustees: Parents note that in many
districts there has been a failure to demonstrate any level of
commitment or accountability on this issue. Silence is the
abdication of responsibility.
To Prime Minster Harper and the Federal government we would
like to point out that in July 2005, the OECD Council adopted
the “Recommendation Concerning Guidelines on Earthquake Safety
in Schools”. In February 2007, the OECD reminded member nations
like Canada that, “By adopting the Recommendation,
seismically-active countries are committed to ensuring that
their governments implement the guidelines.” Canada signed on
to these recommendations and there is no evidence of commitment
on the part of the federal government to this issue. Parents
have long stated that this is not actually an educational issue
– it is a public safety and infrastructure issue and as such
should qualify for federal funding as part of the national
disaster mitigation strategy. The 2 basic human rights of
children – to an education and to physical safety – should not
be competing for the same funds.
Perhaps the most powerful statement on the importance of
addressing this issue was made by the OECD experts group in
2004:
“The motivation for school seismic safety is much broader
than the universal human instinct to protect and love
children. The education of children is essential to
maintaining free societies . . . most nations make education
compulsory. A state requirement for compulsory education,
while allowing the continued use of seismically unsafe
buildings, is an unjustifiable practice. School seismic
safety initiatives are based on the premise that the very
future of society is dependent upon the safety of the
children of the world.”
Prime Minister Harper, Premier Campbell and school district
trustees: Parents of BC are looking to all of our politicians
to show leadership in seeing this problem addressed.
Premier Campbell took a critical first step in assessing the
magnitude of the problem and in making a long-term commitment
to seeing the problem addressed. We need all levels of
government to work together to ensure that the mechanisms and
long term resources are put in place to ensure the Premier’s
strong commitment of 2004 is met.
Sincerely,